Yeah, can you imagine the grandkids? "Grampa, what is it time to suck?" I forsee a not too far-off future spent in high-waisted pants or tucked in shirts. What an idiot.
While I admire the artwork of tattoos, I tend to think of tattoos as being a bad idea (though I admit to having a strong dislike of having anything on my skin, from lotion to dirt to clingy clothes); I like to keep my options as open as possible, and a permanent feature such as a tattoo is a closed option. Yes, you can remove them, but it's neither easy nor complete. Plus, I really dont get why women get tattoos, since many of them dont even keep the same hair color for more than a few months. A tattoo is a permanent accessory, isnt it? (Or is that a sexist statement?) Honestly, I dont understand why anyone would want to have something put on their body permanently. I can only think of a few choices I've made over the last quarter century that I'm still pleased with, and not one of them involves fashion.
I saw a video on YouTube where a guy got a tattoo on his eyeball. Really, it is more of just making the whites of his eyes black - it's not like he could have actual artwork done there. Not that I consider any tattoo a work of art. I just don't have it in me to comprehend why anyone would put a permanent mark on their body - much less on their eyeballs! Now that's got to be stupid. Not only can you go blind in the process, but it CANNOT be undone. And how will he ever know if his eyes are bloodshot? I guess if he doesn't care about injecting permanent dye into his eye, he wouldn't care if they were bloodshot. Jaundice? Not a problem! No one will notice!
I have to wonder about this picture, though - it looks more like the work of Photoshop than an actual tattoo. At least if it was, that would give me hope.
7 comments:
Intelligence quotient of a dandelion there Dave..
Yeah, can you imagine the grandkids? "Grampa, what is it time to suck?" I forsee a not too far-off future spent in high-waisted pants or tucked in shirts. What an idiot.
While I admire the artwork of tattoos, I tend to think of tattoos as being a bad idea (though I admit to having a strong dislike of having anything on my skin, from lotion to dirt to clingy clothes); I like to keep my options as open as possible, and a permanent feature such as a tattoo is a closed option. Yes, you can remove them, but it's neither easy nor complete.
Plus, I really dont get why women get tattoos, since many of them dont even keep the same hair color for more than a few months. A tattoo is a permanent accessory, isnt it? (Or is that a sexist statement?)
Honestly, I dont understand why anyone would want to have something put on their body permanently. I can only think of a few choices I've made over the last quarter century that I'm still pleased with, and not one of them involves fashion.
I saw a video on YouTube where a guy got a tattoo on his eyeball. Really, it is more of just making the whites of his eyes black - it's not like he could have actual artwork done there. Not that I consider any tattoo a work of art. I just don't have it in me to comprehend why anyone would put a permanent mark on their body - much less on their eyeballs!
Now that's got to be stupid. Not only can you go blind in the process, but it CANNOT be undone. And how will he ever know if his eyes are bloodshot? I guess if he doesn't care about injecting permanent dye into his eye, he wouldn't care if they were bloodshot. Jaundice? Not a problem! No one will notice!
I have to wonder about this picture, though - it looks more like the work of Photoshop than an actual tattoo. At least if it was, that would give me hope.
I also admire tat's as an art form..but that doesn't mean I want one.
I saw it as as a reminder to himself when his life nears rock bottom.
What a dumbass.
The image came from here. There's a lot of nice work there, but still, seriously.
Post a Comment