No, not literally. Yet.
But it might as well be.
A bit of explaination: I found this post while digging around in my old drafts. It kind of relates to a discussion I was having with Billy Bob Gisher and Holster over the restoration of the Fairness Doctrine, and even though Bush is gone, still applies today. See, it doesnt matter which side the media supports, what matters is to be sure that it doesnt support just one. The fewer owners of the media, the larger those owners are, the more the rest of us lose. Corporations dont grow larger to increase profits, they grow larger to increase power.
See, the Bush Administration, apparently sensing that it, and its criminal Party cohorts were about to be out of a job (despite the best Democratic efforts to the contrary), made sure that they will not be "out of power" for too long by ensuring that the number of voices you hear telling you what's good and what's bad in America are as few as possible.
Click on the below graphic to enlarge, look it over, then remind yourself that this is how it was before Bush and his corporate enablers came to town.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae3f1/ae3f1ab9809f7ad0fd436141430c83c45e4d76ec" alt=""
Why else do you think that newpapers, television and radio stations, which "experts" tell us are losing more readers, viewers, listeners (and presumably money) every day, still keep being sold for record amounts of money? It's not because Charles Foster Murdock, or any other of his ilk feel sorry for those old family-owned media outlets. It's because control of information is the key to control of everything else. That is always, first and foremost, the business of any secret police, and it is why no dictatorship is complete without a coerced, censored or outright crushed press.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97d1f/97d1f71f83324aae35d4eed70bfc351446cf8023" alt=""
Watch, in the next year there will be attempts, probably successful considering the enabling pussies that are the Democratic Party (or the weasley co-conspirators that are the Democratic Party - you decide), attempts to limit, legislate, and increase the liability of websites. Watch for civil lawsuits, pundit attacks and a fierce new wave of conservative blogging. I'm calling it - you'll see.
Oh, and might I add, Google isnt exactly slacking off in the media acquisition game, so it might be a good idea to have a new blog site ready and waiting somewhere, just in case.
props to Spiiderweb on the story
Props also to Truth In Our Time for the graphics.
2 comments:
Net Neutrality isn't all its cracked up to be - it's a tool that Google is using to help keep the income stream of the 'people' going into google's pockets, not the 'peoples'...just a side note on how Google is not a good guy...and this wole legislated digital conversion...fishy...
I'll agree that Google is nobody's knight in shining armor (but Google's), but for the timebeing, it's more a case of pitting your enemies against each other. Net neutrality may not be ideal, but eliminating it wont be either, not if it's in the hands of Big Media. Slay Goliath, then worry about his generals.
Post a Comment